<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship (NCCS)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canceradvocacy.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canceradvocacy.org</link>
	<description>The power of survivorship...  The promise of quality care</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 21:50:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Shelley Fuld Nasso Joins NCCS as Director of Public Policy</title>
		<link>http://www.canceradvocacy.org/news/shelley-fuld-nasso-joins-nccs-as-director-of-public-policy/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=shelley-fuld-nasso-joins-nccs-as-director-of-public-policy</link>
		<comments>http://www.canceradvocacy.org/news/shelley-fuld-nasso-joins-nccs-as-director-of-public-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 06:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NCCS_Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cancer News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canceradvocacy.org/?p=4214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shelley Fuld Nasso has joined the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship (NCCS) as Senior Director of Policy, with responsibility for leading public policy activities, patient education, and other programs. Ms. Fuld Nasso previously served as [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shelley Fuld Nasso has joined the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship (NCCS) as Senior Director of Policy, with responsibility for leading public policy activities, patient education, and other programs. Ms. Fuld Nasso previously served as Director of Public Policy and Director of Public and Medical Affairs at Susan G. Komen for the Cure. She brings to NCCS more than two decades of leadership in the fields of non-profits, philanthropy, and management consulting where she held a variety of roles, including Director of Community Philanthropy with The Dallas Foundation and Director of Strategy for MEplusYOU, a marketing agency in Dallas.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>“Shelley brings to NCCS years of experience in public policy and medical affairs, knowledge of cancer policy issues, and strong relationships with cancer support and advocacy organizations. NCCS and the cancer survivors we serve are fortunate to have the benefit of Shelley’s skills, experience, and knowledge,” said NCCS Executive Director Nina Wendling. “Our Board and staff welcome Shelley back to the cancer community where we will benefit not only from her health policy expertise, but from her collaborative disposition to work with NCCS Board and staff who are dedicated to assuring quality cancer care for all.”</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>As Senior Director of Public Policy, Ms. Fuld Nasso will lead NCCS activities, including:</p>
<ul>
<li> Advocating in Congress and federal agencies for reform of Medicare and other health care systems to ensure cancer care planning and coordination and the empowerment of patients as health care decision-makers;</li>
<li>Representing cancer survivors in the implementation of the Affordable Care Act to guarantee that insurance coverage meets the lifelong needs of cancer survivors and to encourage health system reforms that promote and protect quality, affordable care;</li>
<li>Convening survivors, physicians, researchers and others to investigate solutions to problems related to cancer drug development, access to quality care, and the development of a sustainable system of cancer care;</li>
<li>Articulating the concerns and interests of cancer survivors in policy efforts that relate to cancer care delivery and access, including involvement in regulatory and legislative proposals and initiatives.</li>
</ul>
<p>In accepting this position for NCCS, Ms. Fuld Nasso expressed both her personal and professional interest in working in the area of cancer quality improvement. “Cancer has touched me on a personal level, as I lost my closest friend, Dr. Brent Whitworth, to renal cell carcinoma last year. I witnessed and supported him in his experience with clinical trials, treatment decision-making, palliative care, and ultimately end-of-life care. I am passionate about advocating for quality cancer care and representing the interests of cancer patients, survivors, and caregivers in public policy debates,” said Ms. Fuld Nasso</p>
<p>Ms. Fuld Nasso is a graduate of Rice University and the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canceradvocacy.org/news/shelley-fuld-nasso-joins-nccs-as-director-of-public-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Human Genes Be Patented?</title>
		<link>http://www.canceradvocacy.org/news/can-human-genes-be-patented/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=can-human-genes-be-patented</link>
		<comments>http://www.canceradvocacy.org/news/can-human-genes-be-patented/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 04:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NCCS_Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cancer News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canceradvocacy.org/?p=4210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court considered the question, “Can human genes be patented?” when it heard oral arguments in the case of Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. <a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/association-for-molecular-pathology-v-myriad-genetics-inc/">Case materials</a>, legal commentary, and reports [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #00000a;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">The Supreme Court considered the question, “Can human genes be patented?” when it heard oral arguments in the case of Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. </span></span></span><a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/association-for-molecular-pathology-v-myriad-genetics-inc/"><span style="color: #0000ff;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span>Case materials</span></span></span></span></a><span style="color: #00000a;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">, legal commentary, and reports of the oral arguments are available on </span></span></span><a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/"><span style="color: #0000ff;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span>www.scotusblog.com</span></span></span></span></a><span style="color: #00000a;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">. The </span></span></span><a href="http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-04-15/politics/38556681_1_myriad-s-castanias-patent-protection"><span style="color: #0000ff;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><i><span>Washington Post</span></i></span></span></span></a><span style="color: #00000a;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"> reported after the oral arguments, “The Supreme Court on Monday seemed skeptical that a human gene can be patented but also worried about what a decision to bar such patents would mean for private scientific inquiry and research.”  </span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canceradvocacy.org/news/can-human-genes-be-patented/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Announcements at the American Urological Association Address Screening and Management of Prostate Cancer</title>
		<link>http://www.canceradvocacy.org/news/announcements-at-the-american-urological-association-address-screening-and-management-of-prostate-cancer/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=announcements-at-the-american-urological-association-address-screening-and-management-of-prostate-cancer</link>
		<comments>http://www.canceradvocacy.org/news/announcements-at-the-american-urological-association-address-screening-and-management-of-prostate-cancer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 04:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NCCS_Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cancer News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canceradvocacy.org/?p=4207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several announcements at the American Urological Association (AUA) annual meeting addressed screening and management of prostate cancer. The <a href="http://www.auanet.org/advnews/news-updates.cfm">AUA has narrowed the age range in which it advises that there be informed decision-making about [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="LEFT"><span style="color: #00000a;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">Several announcements at the American Urological Association (AUA) annual meeting addressed screening and management of prostate cancer. The </span></span></span><a href="http://www.auanet.org/advnews/news-updates.cfm"><span style="color: #0000ff;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">AUA has narrowed the age range in which it advises that there be informed decision-making about prostate cancer</span></span></span></span></a><span style="color: #00000a;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">. The professional society now recommends that men between 55 and 70 receive PSA tests. According to the AUA, such screening tests are not routinely recommended for those younger and older than this age range. </span></span></span><a href="http://wap.nytimes.com/2013/05/04/business/prostate-screening-guidelines-are-loosened.html?from=science"><span style="color: #0000ff;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Andrew Pollack of the </span></span></span></span><span style="color: #0000ff;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><i><span style="text-decoration: underline;">New York Times</span></i></span></span></span></a><span style="color: #00000a;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"> discussed the comparison of the AUA recommendations to the United States Preventive Services Task Force. </span></span></span><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/08/business/prostate-cancer-test-from-genomic-health-assesses-risks.html"><span style="color: #0000ff;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Pollack also reported </span></span></span></span><span style="color: #0000ff;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">from the AUA</span></span></span></span></a><span style="color: #00000a;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"> annual meeting about findings related to a test that will distinguish high-risk prostate cancer from disease of lesser risk. </span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canceradvocacy.org/news/announcements-at-the-american-urological-association-address-screening-and-management-of-prostate-cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Our Feel-Good War on Breast Cancer&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.canceradvocacy.org/news/our-feel-good-war-on-breast-cancer/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=our-feel-good-war-on-breast-cancer</link>
		<comments>http://www.canceradvocacy.org/news/our-feel-good-war-on-breast-cancer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NCCS_Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cancer News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canceradvocacy.org/?p=4161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times Magazine of April 28, 2013, features a story by cancer survivor Peggy Orenstein entitled “Our Feel-Good War on Breast Cancer.”  The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/28/magazine/our-feel-good-war-on-breast-cancer.html?hpw">cover story is available online</a> in advance of its [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <i>New York Times Magazine </i>of April 28, 2013, features a story by cancer survivor Peggy Orenstein entitled “Our Feel-Good War on Breast Cancer.”  The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/28/magazine/our-feel-good-war-on-breast-cancer.html?hpw">cover story is available online</a> in advance of its publication in the magazine.</p>
<p>Orenstein concludes her lengthy story about breast cancer treatment and research with these strong comments:</p>
<blockquote><p>“The idea that there could be one solution to breast cancer — screening, early detection, some universal cure — is certainly appealing. All of us — those who fear the disease, those who live with it, our friends and families, the corporations who swathe themselves in pink — wish it were true. Wearing a bracelet, sporting a ribbon, running a race or buying a pink blender expresses our hopes, and that feels good, even virtuous. But making a difference is more complicated than that.</p>
<p>“It has been four decades since the former first lady Betty Ford went public with her breast-cancer diagnosis, shattering the stigma of the disease. It has been three decades since the founding of Komen. Two decades since the introduction of the pink ribbon. Yet all that well-meaning awareness has ultimately made women <i>less</i> conscious of the facts: obscuring the limits of screening, conflating risk with disease, compromising our decisions about health care, celebrating “cancer survivors” who may have never required treating. And ultimately, it has come at the expense of those whose lives are most at risk.”</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/28/magazine/our-feel-good-war-on-breast-cancer.html?hpw&amp;_r=0">Read the Article &gt;&gt;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canceradvocacy.org/news/our-feel-good-war-on-breast-cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cancer Leadership Council Statement: Reform Medicare Payment for Patient-Focused Care</title>
		<link>http://www.canceradvocacy.org/policy-comments/cancer-leadership-council-statement-reform-medicare-payment-for-patient-focused-care/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=cancer-leadership-council-statement-reform-medicare-payment-for-patient-focused-care</link>
		<comments>http://www.canceradvocacy.org/policy-comments/cancer-leadership-council-statement-reform-medicare-payment-for-patient-focused-care/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NCCS_Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cancer News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Comments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canceradvocacy.org/?p=4159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NCCS joined its colleagues in the Cancer Leadership Council in publishing a statement of principles to guide reform of Medicare payment for cancer care.  Major news outlets have suggested that Medicare beneficiaries are not receiving [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NCCS joined its colleagues in the Cancer Leadership Council in publishing a statement of principles to guide reform of Medicare payment for cancer care.  Major news outlets have suggested that Medicare beneficiaries are not receiving their cancer care due to the 2% cuts in Medicare payments required under the sequestration. NCCS and other cancer advocates have pledged to monitor the impact of sequestration on cancer patients.  While sequestration is a concern, major reform of Medicare payment for cancer care is needed, and the CLC identified principles that would ensure a more patient-focused system of care.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Cancer-Leadership-Council-statement-on-reimbursement-for-quality-cancer-.pdf">Read the comments &gt;&gt;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canceradvocacy.org/policy-comments/cancer-leadership-council-statement-reform-medicare-payment-for-patient-focused-care/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
